Quality of Society and Leaders Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Quality of smart set and Leaders - Essay ExampleBut, either these two are pendent on each other is a opposite concept than measurement. Therefore, this essay focuses on a phenomenon to bring up that either reference of guild is dependent on the quality of its leader, which is very minimal (Robert & Matsumiya, 2007, p. 10). 1.2 The quality of a confederation depends upon the quality of its leaders Quality cannot be quantified. There can be counterchanges in the society. research indicated that these changes arise due to the changing political conditions. There are many factors due which leaders are unable to affect the quality of society (Williamson, 2010, p. 555). Leaders are unable to affect the quality of society due to the following three reasons i.e. society shapes the potential leaders society itself chooses a leader society itself determines the limit of change in its quality Society shapes the potential leaders Society influences the development of leaders and preven ts them from affecting the quality of a society. It is the society who influences the individuals not the leaders. Societal environment, individual action and structure, all these represent together (Bunge, 1997, p.420). They are the forms of one another. Leaders are included in these individual who lives in a society, therefore they are also influenced from the quality of society. But any(prenominal) leader who has stronger potential can stand firm the influence of society. This combination of influence from society and leaders is hard to survive. Whether a leader is strong or weak, but they are mainly shaped by the society. This manner that society itself chooses and shapes a leader this means it cannot gain a person with some differentiated skills. Therefore, societies cannot rely on these leaders to change its quality. Society itself chooses a leader Mainly society itself chooses a leader. Therefore it reduces the chances of getting a leader with some different and innovati ve qualities, it chooses a leader who have same qualities that of former. This is done through modern political sympathies i.e. a leader is selected on the basis of elections. Societies mainly choose those leaders, which reflect their quality and are instead similar to it, rather than selecting such leaders who have different qualities as compared to the quality of a particular(prenominal) society. This phenomenon have not been promoted in this modern world, it was present late back in 16th vitamin C i.e. only those individuals were selected as a leader who had similarity with the quality of a society (Nietzsche, 1983). Even if a leader retires, he is replaced by a person who has similar qualities as that of former. This means it does not resist any change in the quality of leadership. For instance, in 1848, French Revolution people selected a saucily regime on the basis of volunteer, which was similar to the older one. This revolution did not lead to achievement of its goals ( Marx, 1969). remotion of the regime indicated that there wasnt a change in leadership but there was a change in the quality of society. In case if the quality of society do not change even after replacing a leader, it indicates that quality of society is not dependent on the quality of leaders. Society itself determines the limit of change in its quality In case if a leader with different quality is considered and selected for a society. It blocks the way of leaders to implement any change by allocating limits. Following a different virtue is difficult for the society and in case if it does not value that, it will